Evidence for a young earth
The 3-6-2026 ‘Triceratops skeleton…’ stated the price of a set of dinosaur bones can now bring up to $44 million, mainly due to a new shift toward objects that have “cultural resonance.” Also states the bones are 66 million years old; but are they?
Recent discoveries of soft tissue in dinosaur bones tells me they were probably buried rapidly in far less than a million years ago, thereby avoiding complete tissue decay. Can any experiment show us how soft tissue lasts millions of years?
Rapid burial was probably accomplished by the impact of a 6-mile diameter rock traveling at 12 miles per second, slamming into earth with an energy of some 72 trillion tons of TNT, blasting 25 trillion tons of material into the atmosphere. The shock would have sent 600-mph winds and mega-tsunamis sloshing across the globe, ripping up everything in their path.
All life would have been rapidly buried under silt, rocks and ash. The shock caused the continental plates to break up and slide into the mantle. Earthquakes set off massive volcanic eruptions. Glaciers formed rapidly when sunlight was blocked by atmospheric dust thereby freezing massive rainfalls.
From an anthropology perspective, note Nick Liguori’s “Echoes of Ararat” drawing from some 300 non-Christian native legends referencing some kind of global flood, i.e. a Rosebud Lakota man referring to creating power stomping on earth, which split open in many places with water flowing out of them. This seems to align with Genesis 7:11.
Could this rock have been a large asteroid? (Search Chicxulub impact)
Evidence for a young earth far outweighs the flawed radiometric methodology which produces billions years age of earth as proposed by mainstream science.
This dubious ‘Old Age’ worldview has even permeated religion. I recently read in a ‘Youth Bible’ that we do not have to believe the world was created in six 24 hour days. Another source said we need not believe creation was 5199 years BC, and Noah’s flood was 2957 years before Christ. However, today this ‘Biblical fundamentalism’ seems far closer to reality than what mainstream science feeds us.
Phil Drietz
Delhi
