Residents continue to speak out at CapX meetings
By Deb GauMARSHALL - Another series of public meetings on the proposed CapX 2020 power line project began Monday in Marshall. However, in addition to the property and health concerns voiced at the meeting, some area residents said their voices weren't being heard.
The CapX project, proposed by Great River Energy and Xcel Energy, would build 345-kilovolt transmission lines running from a substation near Brookings, S.D., to Hampton, south of the Twin Cities. The Minnesota Department of Commerce Office of Energy Security is currently collecting public input for an environmental impact statement on two proposed transmission routes. The impact statement is part of the permit application process for the project.
Some residents of Lyon County townships said they were unhappy about not being allowed to form a citizens' advisory task force on the routing process, like residents along the eastern parts of the routes had done.
"We applied, and from what I understand we were denied," said Galen Boerboom, a resident of Westerheim Township. Boerboom said he had communicated with OES staff about forming a task force, but received no response. "There's a lot of mistrust that comes, and a lot of questions unanswered."
Grandview Township Clerk Brian Buysse said he had spoken personally with OES project manager Scott Ek about forming a task force. Harold Dieken of Fairview Township said he had also communicated with Ek via e-mail.
OES representatives at the meeting said they had mailed letters inquiring about task forces to area city, county and township government, but they received few responses. In the two areas that did form task forces, the government response was much larger, they said.
"If we don't receive enough requests from (local government) entities, we can't do it," Ek said.
"I think there's a lot of citizen interest, but that's what these meetings are for," said Deborah Pile of the OES.
Other comments at the meeting included concerns about the effects of power lines on people and livestock, and concerns about how close the lines would pass to homes and farm property.
Large satellite photos of the proposed transmission routes were on display at Monday's meeting. Great River Energy and Xcel Energy were required to identify a preferred and an alternate route for the permit process.
The energy companies' preferred route runs south of Hendricks and Minneota, takes a detour around Marshall to the Lyon County substation and passes on through Redwood County, crossing the Redwood River in the Cedar Mountain area. The alternate route starts out farther south, passing through Lynd and then turning north before following State Highway 19 toward Redwood Falls. Both proposed routes also include lines running north to the Minnesota Valley substation near Granite Falls.
Dan Wambeke of Green Valley was one of several people who asked project officials to keep the transmission lines away from homes.
"I don't know if I could live with putting my children near one of these," Wambeke said. He added that the location of his home and others had been marked incorrectly on the route permit application.
Craig Poorker of Great River Energy said that health and safety issues are automatically studied for the environmental impact statement. However, he encouraged residents with suggestions for alternate line routes to submit them to the OES.
The Minnesota Public Utilities Commission will likely reach a decision this spring on whether to approve a certificate of need for the CapX project, Ek and Poorker said. It's a process separate from the environmental impact study and route permit. If the PUC doesn't determine a need for the transmission lines, Poorker said, plans for line routes will not continue.
Other public meetings on CapX will be held this week. On Tuesday, a meeting will be held at 5 p.m. at the Midwest Center for Wind Energy in Hendricks. On Wednesday, meetings will be held at noon at Prairie's Edge Casino, and at 5 p.m. at the Redwood Area Community Center in Redwood Falls.
Ek said written comments from the public will be accepted until April 30.
|
CarolOverland
|
|
|---|---|
|
03-31-09 11:23 AM
|
If you want a Citizens Task Force, YOU SHOULD GET ONE. See ****nocapx2020.info and search for "Citizen Task Force." I filed a Petition for Task Force in this docket, as I have in so many others, so that people would have opportunity, MOES always objects, and only set up ones on the eastern side of Brookings line. That is not right. If you want to file again (frankly, I think it's time to sue them over this crap), contact me, see ****legalectric**** or ****nocapx2020.info for contact info. I'm really tired of citizens being screwed like this. And it's all because of the success of past Task Forces, like Florence Township, and Chisago, where we showed that the projects were bad ideas, not needed, and should not be done. Shame on MOES for denying you your rights. Stand up!
|
|
CrunchyCon
|
|
|
03-31-09 10:30 AM
|
The good thing is that the State has this process, allowing for public input into utility project like this. The bad thing is that the State is either overworked or incompetent (or both?), and it's difficult to know whether public input will really be considered. This article doesn't do justice to the verbal dressing-down that Scott Ek received at this meeting in regard to the Citizen's Task Force issue. After saying "we received no interest in this area about creating one" several people stepped forward to basically say, "You're not telling the truth. You did - I talked to you personally about it". Lots of anger in the room directed right at him. It may well be true that there wasn't *enough* interest, but he seemed clueless that there had been *any* interest at all. Not a good sign at all....
|