In my World there is no sky. It is covered by an atmosphere of mainly nitrogen and oxygen that filter the light from our close star making everything look in the following frequency: 450-495 nm. But our brains do have the capability of filtering this predominant frequency allowing a relative rich view from 380 nm to 750 nm. It was actually the observation of our sky that helped some of our best minds discover the theory of relativity, without said effects the sky would look like one continuous and perfect light. That is the effect of having a star upward in every direction of our planet. It was the same person that enlightened us with what we call the Universal Laws of Physics that first spoke of the relation of time and space but his inability to access scientific instruments forced him to discard his curiosity in this matter. It took our kind another 200 years to properly start to understand these Universal Phenomena.

In my World there is no sky. It is covered by an atmosphere of mainly nitrogen and oxygen that filter the light from our close star making everything look in the following frequency: 450-495 nm. But our brains do have the capability of filtering this predominant frequency allowing a relative rich view from 380 nm to 750 nm. It was actually the observation of our sky that helped some of our best minds discover the theory of relativity, without said effects the sky would look like one continuous and perfect light. That is the effect of having a star upward in every direction of our planet. It was the same person that enlightened us with what we call the Universal Laws of Physics that first spoke of the relation of time and space but his inability to access scientific instruments forced him to discard his curiosity in this matter. It took our kind another 200 years to properly start to understand these Universal Phenomena.

You will confirm the absence of the damage necessary to justify your theory.

This information comes from the court records only.

If it helps, I do feel very sorry for Mr. Dennis Devereaux. He comes across like a good person. Actually it is what he said and what he omitted that gave the most clues to the truth.

I just hope he is not dragged into something horrible.

And then the translator volunteers the following without being asked:

Line 145 Interpreter: Inaudible. No, she already say (inaudible) at the hospital. She had her seatbelt and that’s probably why her chest hurts, yeah know, because the seat but (inaudible).

Note: This information was not requested or obtained from Franco. It was proven later that Franco did not have a seat belt on.

According to Franco the bus came on to her and hit her when she was standing still. It makes perfect sense if the axel assembly of the bus hit the van in the front right area, demolished only the front of the van and impacted it with the necessary force to rotate it clockwise for 270 degrees approximately.

At this point we need to assess who was more traumatized, the “poor” bus driver or Franco?

I have proven to you that the translator had zero integrity, confirmed by her own words.

Yes, I will never compare, I just try to follow but is very, very h

Line 127 Interpreter: after she did the stop, the bus came on to her

Line 129 SP 307: Okay

Line 131 Interpreter: and hit her. That’s what she said. That’s how I know. I told you.

Note: according to Franco the bus came on to her and hit her when she was standing still. It makes perfect sense if the axel assembly of the bus hit the van in the front right area, demolished only the front of the van and impacted it with the necessary force to rotate it clockwise for 270 degrees approximately.

Continues up

Line 65 SP 307: Okay. Can you ask her where she was going? Line 67: Interpreter: Ah. She was on her way to work through, I mean, sir. She already told me. She already told me she was on her work to cab, cabinetry.

Note: Every time the interpreter translated a question there are two lines of “Inaudible”- probably words spoken in Spanish. Line 67 does not have said lines and therefore as it is quite obvious it was the interpreter that made the statement and not Franco.

Line 106 Interpreter: I was driving to cabinet. At the beginning, she told me I was driving (Again the interpreter is placing words and not translating) ……………………………

The entire case rested on this hearsay statement by the translator.

Continues up

Line 125 DD: “I assume we got booted around and it plowed into the other side of the bus.

Note: Here we must consider that the bus driver is speculating again. The fact is that he only felt ONE impact and then speculates about the other vehicle. But please note that he never confirms which vehicle hit him.

The rest of the Statement continues to be erratic and contradictory until he describes the children, then we observe that his language was firm and comfortable.

There is another major contradiction in DD statement regarding the engine, but we still do not have all the pertinent information.

Continues up.

From the Bus Driver statement (2/19/2008, 20:43)

Line 56:

DD-“I had no idea that that car (he had just referred to the red van before, changing to car) or that, I mean, obviously it was coming

Line 58: SP 307: Uh, Huh ( an intended interruption by State patrolman Dana Larsen-

The statement does turn completely incoherent and out of time sequence.

Line 115 SP 307: Okay. Do you have an idea where that van hit your bus at or?

Line 117 DD: I don’t know for sure. I never looked at the bus but.

Note: here the bus driver states that he does not know about the impact and as he is going to clarify the Trooper interrupts with:

Line 123 SP 307: Do you recall me? UM. Do you know where this other pickup came from that yeah landed on?

Note: Why does the Trooper ask if he is remembered, this is line 123 well into the statement and obviously long after the initial interview. Now, it is the Trooper that brings in the gray pickup and adds the fact that the b

Very interesting theory, but the bus center of gravity of the bus is much higher than the axel. In a cross sectional view by finite elements your appreciation might be right, but that would be limited to a few fractions of an inch before and after the axel. The main body of the bus with its mass will change the moment of inertia in a vertical plain considerably above the transversal axis of the axel.

For your interpretation to be correct we would need two basic conditions: 1 Damage to the bus body on the right above the wheelbase. 2 The bus body would have deformed in a boomerang shape pointing towards the left.

Facts: 1 There is no damage to the body of the bus on the right side 2 The bus body was deformed pointing to the right side.

WRONG SIDE

If I have misinterpreted your appreciation of the facts please elaborate. I will appreciate all the help I can get to understand this most complicated accident and thank you.

Continues up.

At first I was most discussed with the defense in the case and highly critical.

It was later pointed out to me that their procedure was correct. Their duty was to defend Franco and that is what they did. Apparently there was something far more profound in this case as events unveiled but it then was too late to do anything about it.

I am sure that the defense will be far, far more prepared this time around.

I think that the families of the victims will be the most interested in finding the truth.

WRONG SIDE

You are so coherent! Everybody that was present at the seen of the accident came to the same conclusion. The rest of the World does not believe you. See, there are these rules or Laws of Physics that rule the visible Universe, except in Cottonwood.

Had the van hit the bus anywhere else but the axel, the damage to the van would be at the windshield level, probably decapitating the passengers, but the windshield was still in place (broken, but in place). Had the van hit the axel as claimed the axel would be dislodged to the direction of travel of the van, the left side of the bus. But the pictures place it on the right side.

You said: “the van hit just ahead of the axle tearing the body off of the axle that is why the axle was on the side of the van.” In order for that to happen, the bus would be deformed like a boomerang pointing to the left side, but the bus body was deformed, yes, but it points to it’s right side. And again, there is no evidence of this impact i